Parijat &
Bagga (2014), states that the motivation theories are divided in to two
categories as Content theories that focus on individual needs and Process
Theories which focus on cognitive processes which motivate the individuals. The
Expectancy theory propounded by Victor Vroom in 1964, is a process theory which
provides a sort of a mechanism for finding out motivation through a certain
type of calculation (Eerde et al, 1996). Vroom’s Expectancy Theory states that
motivation will be high when people are aware on the things they have to do in
order to get a reward (Armstrong & Taylor, 2020). Moreover, there is an
expectancy that they will be able to get the reward as well as the reward will
be worthwhile. The strength of expectations are based on the past experiences
(reinforcement).
Werner (2002,
p.335) states that an employee will exert a high effort if he believes there is
reasonable probability that the effort will lead to the achievement of an
organizational goal, and Simultaneously, the achievement of the organizational
goal will become an instrument through which that employee will attain his
personal goals. Hence, there is a link between expectancy, effort, productivity
and reward (Mathibe, 2008).
Furthermore,
the expectancy theory unlocks potentiality of employee productivity. Mathibe (2008)
states that, it is assumed that unlocking of potential is linked to empowerment
which gives the confidence to employees in order to attempt anything. As
adapted from Robinson (1992), table 1 provides a summary of essentials for
unlocking potential.
Table
1: Essentials for unlocking
employees' potential
|
Communicating |
The manager keeps his or her team members up-todate and in
the picture on a regular basis |
|
Horses for courses |
The manager allocates work in ways that match staff
members’ capabilities and preferences |
|
Valuing differences |
The manager encourages respect, trust and understanding
between team members |
|
Work standards |
The manager sets realistic and clear standards for job
performance |
|
Participative decision making |
When it is appropriate the manager makes sure that she/he
involves team members in those decisions that would affect them and their
performance |
Source: Robinson,
1992
Application of Expectancy Theory in Organizational Context
Most of the profit
oriented organizations are looking for employees who are motivated to top
performing in pursuit of competitive advantages. Top performing people are goal
directed (Coetsee, 2003). The financial services sector is highly competitive
and it is necessary for an institute to increase the customer loyalty in order
to retain the customers for long term. Hence, a goal oriented high performing staff
will easily achieve the organizational goals. As per the knowledge drawn from
scholars about expectancy theory, there are various employee behaviors
identified that prove the organization has used motivational rewards to
encourage the employees in cognitive basis. The predicted behaviors are, an
employee will work for extra hours for career advancement, maintain superior
inter-personal relations, project a more ethical image and do similar other
things (Parijat & Bagga, 2014).
Reference
Armstrong,
M. and Taylor, S., 2020. Armstrong's handbook of human resource management
practice.
Chopra,
K., 2019. Indian shopper motivation to use artificial intelligence: Generating
Vroom’s expectancy theory of motivation using grounded theory approach. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.
Coetsee,
L.D., 2003. Peak performance and productivity. Potchefstroom: Van Schaik. Collis, J. & Hussey.
Mathibe,
I., 2008. Expectancy theory and its implications for employee motivation. Academic Leadership: the Online Journal, 6(3), p.8.
Nimri,
M., Bdair, A. and Al Bitar, H., 2015. Applying the expectancy theory to explain
the motivation of public sector employees in Jordan. Middle east journal of business, 10(3), pp.70-82.
Parijat,
P. and Bagga, S., 2014. Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory of motivation–An
evaluation. International Research Journal of Business and Management, 7(9), pp.1-8.
Robinson,
G.M., 1992. Managing after the superlatives: Effective senior management development
for the 1990's. Tudor (Hodder & Stoughton).
Van
Eerde, W. and Thierry, H., 1996. Vroom's expectancy models and work-related
criteria: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 81(5), p.575.
Werner, A.
2002. Leadership. In: Nel, P.S., Gerber, P.D., Van Dyk, P.S., Haasbroek, G.D.,

Hi gihan, agree with you, adding to your point, Valence will measure the value of a given reward that an individual. These may be extrinsic or intrinsic. The model in reality they are subjective and incredibly (McGrath and Bates, 2017).
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Dineth. Although it is a more complex theory of motivation, Vroom’s Expectancy Theory states that motivation will be high when people are aware on the things they have to do in order to get a reward (Armstrong & Taylor, 2020). In simpler words the Expectancy Theory can predict if an employee will work for extra hours for career advancement, maintain superior inter-personal relations, project a more ethical image and do similar other things (Parijat & Bagga, 2014)
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Gihan, detailed analysis. However, House et al (1974) raises some concerns about the validity of expectancy theory. They argued that variables such as leadership behaviour, individual characteristics, nature of the task and the practices of the organization make it harder to predict how expectations function.
ReplyDeleteHi Divakar. Thank you for the comment. According to Porter & Lowler (1968), in other hand, employee effort is not enough to receive the rewards, it requires the ability such as intelligence, knowledge or skills and the role perceptions which means what the individual wants to do or thinks they are required to do for produce the desired performance through effective effort.
Delete